ここで結論出てた
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1394092843/

551 ：名無し編集部員：2014/03/08(土) 16:55:08.24 ID:3HjalVcGHi Jim-san.

Between you and us, There is a difference of recognition.
This is because of the difference in language.
So, I try to make 3 images for description of our recognition.
Now, There are 3 styles of external sites.
Wiki , Log site and Matome.
Please watch these images.

Wiki style （Wiki形式）
http://i.imgur.com/aTvsVTx.jpg

Log site style　（ログサイト形式）
http://i.imgur.com/0SqL7nS.jpg

Matome style（まとめ形式）
http://i.imgur.com/btV6oOp.jpg

We think Wiki style is OK.
But, Log site style and Matome style is NO.
REPRODUTION（転載） we are saying means ONLY MATOME STYLE.
We can　NOT tolerate them.
Wiki style is quotation（引用） and it's OK.

If default name include 転載禁止(reproduciton prophibit) ,Wiki style is allowed .
Because it is quotation（引用）, not reproduction（転載.）.
Other sites that use 2ch posts by quotation are OK too .
Your concerns DON'T occur.

How do you think Matome style and Wiki style ?

559 ：xerxes.maido3.net＠Apparently admin ★：2014/03/08(土) 17:17:45.32 ID:???>>551
These are very nice illustrations.
You are understanding Fair Use.
You are defending your use.

要約すると、wikiOK、ログコピーサイトとアフィブログはダメって言うのがFair Useだってさ