>>328
>Whilst there may be a possibility that the Respondent is holding the Disputed Domain Name on behalf of the Complainant,
and the Complainant “entrusted” the Respondent to operate the “2channel” business on behalf of the Complainant, insufficient evidence has been provided.
UDRPの裁定内容
ドメイン名保持と2ch事業の委託の可能性を挙げているが、パネラは主張に含まれてないことを勝手に邪推したりはしない